On Freedom

Is freedom about human rights?

For example, the right to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom from violence, freedom to elect your government.

I would call these freedoms various forms of external freedom, and they are certainly to be valued but for me this is not the best kind of freedom.

What about the freedom of choice?

I can choose between various alternatives or I can choose not to choose anything. But if I look more closely at how I make my choices I discover that I have weighed up all the pros and cons of the different alternatives and this information has come from my memory bank and past experience. I rarely make a choice based on having no knowledge or past experience of my options as this would seem to be too risky and at best foolhardy. For me once again this kind of freedom is an improvement because it comes from within me but it is still tied to my previous conditioning, that is, to the past. I am like a goat on a lead, but tied to a memory tree.

What about my attitude?

It is not what happens to you that counts. It is how you react to what happens to you, especially when you have unfortunate surprises. But even this kind of freedom is still a reaction.

The prefix re in react gives the game away. Re literally means to return to a previous state, go back, do it again etc. Surely this is only repeating the past and you are once again like a goat tethered to a short lead.

Is there a state of freedom that has no attachment to anything, that is free of all illusions, free of time and space, free of language and words?

If there was such a state then this would be real freedom.

But my thinking, noisy mind would have to be quiet for this state to be.

This silent consciousness was our birthright before social conditioning and the ‘me’ was invented by man for improved group communication and physical survival.

Doesn’t seem like a fair trade to me.

But then who said life was fair?

Please Life give me back my free innocent consciousness!

Sorry my dear friend, it was never your consciousness in the first place.

That’s why it was free.

You are the problem.

Let go of yourself…and there is no how.

Bookmark and Share
  • Frank

    Interesting article Gary

    I follow what you are saying and it is good. I do like to look at Choice and Reaction a little more closely though.

    One form of choice is as you said, dependent on the available alternatives and past information and experiences. But there seems to me to be another form of choice that is deeper. It is the choice to identify with an entity or not. If I choose not to identify with an identity, then the unknown is directing me and that was due to my choice of letting go and allowing it to take over control.

    Regarding ‘reaction’ you are right in that reaction is always automatic. However we can instead ‘respond’ (if we are aware and interested) to what happens to us rather than react. Responding may be coming from the unknown if we so choose to allow it.

    WDYT?

  • admin

    Frank, thanks for your thoughtful comments.

    Regarding choice to let go, I think this is more about surrendering to the unknowable which is not really a choice in the normal way we think about choice, but an awakening to the limitations of the mind that chooses and realising at a deep level that any choice whatsoever is coming from a conditioned entity that is false.

    Remember the ego is very, very clever, and will use every trick in the book but it is not intelligent because intelligence is not trapped by the past!

    Regarding responding – this is still using prior knowledge. The ‘re’ means to go back.

    There is integrated action that comes from living intelligently moment to moment, without a doer.

    Then there is dualistic reaction that comes from the ego or one’s past conditioning.

    If thought is directing your life even at a minimal level, then the ego is still in charge.

    When silent awareness is directing your life, there is no-one in charge.

    Who said that??